Desarrollo de los cuidados paliativos pediátricos en Uruguay, 2008-2020: informe de avances / Development of pediatric palliative care in Uruguay, 2008-2020: progress report / Desenvolvimento dos cuidados paliativos pediátricos no Uruguai nos anos 2008-2020: relatório de progresso

Desde el año 2007 en Uruguay los cuidados paliativos (CP) son parte de las prestaciones de salud que todos los ciudadanos que los necesitan tienen derecho a recibir y, desde entonces, ha aumentado significativamente la accesibilidad a estos. Objetivo: describir la situación actual del desarrollo organizativo de servicios de cuidados paliativos pediátricos (CPP) en el país y los pacientes por ellos asistidos desde el inicio de sus actividades hasta el 31/12/2020, las principales fortalezas y desafíos percibidos por los profesionales de dichos equipos. Metodología: se realizó una consulta mediante encuesta online auto administrada enviada a los coordinadores de servicios de CPP del Uruguay. Resultados: se confirmaron 19 equipos en 9/19 departamentos, 5/19 están integrados por profesionales de las cuatro disciplinas básicas recomendadas, el resto por distintas combinaciones de disciplinas, con cargas horarias muy variables. Brindan asistencia en: hospitalización 19/19, policlínica 18/19, atención domiciliaria coordinada 13/19 y retén telefónico 10/19. Fueron asistidos 2957 niños, 23% de los mismos fallecieron. 16/19 equipos reportan como principales fortalezas los valores compartidos y el trabajo en equipo interdisciplinario y 15/19 como principal desafío los déficits de recursos humanos. Conclusiones: persisten importantes inequidades en el acceso a los CPP. Se constató gran variabilidad en la integración de los equipos y la carga horaria de los profesionales. Es necesario que las autoridades sanitarias continúen promoviendo y exigiendo el desarrollo de equipos de CPP en las instituciones y departamentos que no los tienen y el cumplimiento de estándares mínimos de calidad en los ya existentes.

Since 2007, palliative care (PC) has been a part of the health benefits that all Uruguayan citizens are entitled to receive and, since then, accessibility has increased significantly. Objective: to describe the present development of pediatric palliative care services (PPC) in Uruguay and the patients assisted by health providers since the beginning of their services until 12/31/2020 and the key strengths and challenges perceived by these palliative care teams. Methodology: a consultation was carried out through a self-administered online survey and sent to the PPC service coordinators in Uruguay. Results: 19 teams were confirmed in 9/19 departments, 5/19 are integrated by professionals from the four recommended basic disciplines, the rest by different combinations of disciplines, with highly variable workloads. They provide assistance in: hospitalization 19/19, clinics 18/19, coordinated home care 13/19 and telephone assistance 10/19. 2957 children were assisted, 23% of them died. 16/19 teams report shared values and interdisciplinary teamwork as their main strengths, and 15/19 report human resource shortage as their main challenge. Conclusions: significant inequality persist regarding access to PPCs. We confirmed a high variability in teams' integration and professional workload. It is necessary for the health authorities to continue to promote and demand the development of PPC teams in the institutions and departments that do not yet have them and the compliance with minimum quality standards in those that already operate.

Desde 2007, os cuidados paliativos (CP) fazem parte dos benefícios de saúde que todos os cidadãos têm direito a receber no Uruguai e, desde então, a acessibilidade a eles tem aumentado significativamente. Objetivo: descrever a situação atual do desenvolvimento organizacional dos serviços de cuidados paliativos pediátricos (CPP) no Uruguai e dos pacientes atendidos desde o início de suas atividades até 31/12/2020 e as principais fortalezas e desafios percebidos pelos profissionais das referidas equipes. Metodologia: foi realizada uma consulta por meio de uma pesquisa online autoaplicável enviada aos coordenadores dos serviços do CPP no Uruguai. Resultados: 19 equipes foram confirmadas em 19/09 departamentos, 19/05 compostas por profissionais das quatro disciplinas básicas recomendadas, o restante por diferentes combinações de disciplinas, com cargas horárias altamente variáveis. Elas atendem em: internação 19/19, policlínica 18/19, atendimento domiciliar coordenado 13/19 e posto telefônico 19/10. 2.957 crianças foram atendidas, 23% delas faleceram. 16/19 equipes relatam valores compartilhados e trabalho em equipe interdisciplinar como suas principais fortalezas, e 15/19 relatam déficits de recursos humanos como seu principal desafio. Conclusões: persistem desigualdades significativas no acesso aos CPP. Verificou-se: grande variabilidade na integração das equipes e na carga de trabalho dos profissionais. É necessário que as autoridades de saúde continuem promovendo e exigindo o desenvolvimento de equipes de CPP nas instituições e departamentos que não as possuem e o cumprimento de padrões mínimos de qualidade nas que já existem.

Advance care planning and the parental geographical background in pediatric palliative home care: a retrospective chart review.

The relevance to acknowledge the parental migration history in pediatric palliative care is widely recognized. However, its influence on integral parts of advance care planning (ACP) is unknown. In this non-interventional cohort study, we aimed at identifying systematic differences between pediatric palliative patients with varying parental countries of origin regarding medical orders for life-sustaining treatment and the location of patients' death. Two hundred eighty-eight pediatric cases in an ambulant pediatric palliative care setting in Germany were retrospectively analyzed using multinomial logistic regression models. Agreements on medical orders for life-sustaining treatment (MOLST) differed significantly between patients with varying parental countries of origin. Full code orders for life-sustaining treatment were made more often in Turkish families than in German families. There were no significant associations between the patients' location of death and the parental countries of origin. However, confounder-analysis revealed a strong association between the patients' underlying disease and the orders for life-sustaining treatment as well as the location of death.Conclusions: Even this study indicates that the parental geographical background as an important sociocultural aspect might have an impact on ACP decisions for children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions, other factors as the patients' underlying disease can be more crucial for decision making in pediatric palliative care. The reason for the differences found might lay in cultural preferences or barriers to appropriate care. The inclusion of sociocultural aspects in decision-making is crucial to guarantee culture-sensitive, patient-centered pediatric palliative care.

Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): A longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Reports on medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infections largely lack quantification of incidence and relative risk. We describe the rationale and methods of the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Registry (INSPIRE) that combines patient-reported outcomes with data from digital health records to understand predictors and impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: INSPIRE is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study of individuals with symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight regions across the US. Adults are eligible for enrollment if they are fluent in English or Spanish, reported symptoms suggestive of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and if they are within 42 days of having a SARS-CoV-2 viral test (i.e., nucleic acid amplification test or antigen test), regardless of test results. Recruitment occurs in-person, by phone or email, and through online advertisement. A secure online platform is used to facilitate the collation of consent-related materials, digital health records, and responses to self-administered surveys. Participants are followed for up to 18 months, with patient-reported outcomes collected every three months via survey and linked to concurrent digital health data; follow-up includes no in-person involvement. Our planned enrollment is 4,800 participants, including 2,400 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 2,400 SARS-CoV-2 negative participants (as a concurrent comparison group). These data will allow assessment of longitudinal outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection and comparison of the relative risk of outcomes in individuals with and without infection. Patient-reported outcomes include self-reported health function and status, as well as clinical outcomes including health system encounters and new diagnoses. RESULTS: Participating sites obtained institutional review board approval. Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: This study will characterize medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection among a diverse population, predictors of sequelae, and their relative risk compared to persons with similar symptomatology but without SARS-CoV-2 infection. These data may inform clinical interventions for individuals with sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the physician education program on primary palliative care in heart failure.

Major cardiology societies' guidelines support integrating palliative care into heart failure (HF) care. This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of the HEart failure Palliative care Training program for comprehensive care providers (HEPT), a physician education program on primary palliative care in HF. We performed a pre- and post-test survey to evaluate HEPT outcomes. Physician-reported practices, difficulties and knowledge were evaluated using the Palliative Care Self-Reported Practices Scale in HF (PCPS-HF), Palliative Care Difficulties Scale in HF (PCDS-HF), and Palliative care knowledge Test in HF (PT-HF), respectively. Structural equation models (SEM) were used to estimate path coefficients for PCPS-HF, PCDS-HF, and PT-HF. A total of 207 physicians participated in the HEPT between February 2018 and July 2019, and 148 questionnaires were ultimately analyzed. The total PCPS-HF, PCDS-HF, and PT-HF scores were significantly improved 6 months after HEPT completion (61.1 vs 67.7, p<0.001, 54.9 vs 45.1, p<0.001, and 20.8 vs 25.7, p<0.001, respectively). SEM analysis showed that for pre-post difference (Dif) PCPS-HF, "clinical experience of more than 14 years" and pre-test score had significant negative effects (-2.31, p = 0.048, 0.52, p<0.001, respectively). For Dif PCDS-HF, ≥ "28 years old or older" had a significant positive direct effect (13.63, p<0.001), although the pre-test score had a negative direct effect (-0.56, p<0.001). For PT-HF, "involvement in more than 50 HF patients' treatment in the past year" showed a positive direct effect (0.72, p = 0.046), although the pre-test score showed a negative effect (-0.78, p<0.001). Physicians who completed the HEPT showed significant improvements in practice, difficulty, and knowledge scales in HF palliative care.

[Better care for cancer and Covid-19 patients in pandemic and everyday life]. / Mieux soigner les patients atteints de cancer et de Covid-19 en pandémie et au quotidien.

The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated the opening of a dedicated inpatient unit for the management of cancer and Covid-19 patients in a cancer center. We report the support by the mobile palliative care team of team resilience in cancer work. The complexity of patient management required the implementation of multidisciplinarity which allowed to face adversity to provide better care in pandemic, then in daily life.

Using routine databases to evaluate Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS).

In response to the government's drive to expand Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS) across England by 2020, further evidence for this intervention needs to be established quickly. With palliative and end-of-life care research being an underfunded area, the availability and lower costs of routine databases make it an attractive resource to integrate into studies evaluating EPaCCS without jeopardising research quality. This article describes how routine databases can be used to address the current paucity of high-quality evidence; they can be used in a range of study designs, including randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, and may also be able to contribute quality of life or patient-reported outcome measures.

Impacto en el consumo de recursos de un programa integrado de cuidados paliativos en Colombia / Impact of resources consumption of an integrated palliative care program in Colombia

Introducción: El desarrollo de Programas de Cuidados Paliativos ha demostrado ser costo-eficiente, generando ahorros en los sistemas de salud. En Colombia, en los últimos años se ha producidoun importante desarrollo de programas y recursos de cuidados paliativos, por lo que se hace necesario medir el impacto de la implementación de estos programas en el país.Objetivo: Analizar el consumo de recursos y costes al final de la vida tras la implementación de un Programa Integrado de Cuidados Paliativos en una aseguradora privada en Colombia (2016-2019).Método: Estudio descriptivo, longitudinal, retrospectivo, sobre una población de fallecidos susceptibles de cuidados paliativos. Estudio en 3 periodos: 1) antes de la implementación del Programa Integrado de Cuidados Paliativos, 2) primer periodo de Programa Integrado de CuidadosPaliativos, 3) segundo periodo de Programa Integrado de Cuidados Paliativos. Se analizaron, en último trimestre y último mes de vida: estancias en Programa Integrado de Cuidados Paliativos,hospitalizaciones, estancias hospitalarias, costes y ahorros. Las poblaciones fueron consideradas independientes.Resultados: 108 personas previo a implementación del Programa Integrado de Cuidados Paliativos, 139 personas en periodo 1, 186 en periodo 2. Promedio de personas en programa/mes: 35en el periodo 1, 52 en periodo 2, (aumento del 49 %). Permanencia mediana de fallecidos enprograma: 31 días en periodo 1, 40 días en periodo 2 (aumento del 29 %). Promedio de hospitalizaciones (último trimestre de vida) 1,91 en periodo de inicio, 1,42 primer periodo, 1,04 segundoperiodo (reducción del 45 %). Promedio de días de estancias hospitalarias (último trimestre de vida): periodo de inicio 15,5 días, primer periodo 10,4 días, segundo periodo 4,9 días (reducción del 68,4 %). ... (AU)

Introduction: The development of palliative care programs has proven to be cost-efficient,generating savings in health systems. In Colombia, in recent years, there has been an important development of palliative care programs and resources, and it is necessary to measure theimpact of these programs’ implementation in the country.Objective: To analyze the use of healthcare resources and costs at the end of life after implementation of an Integrated palliative care program in a private insurance company in Colombia(2016-2019).Method: In a retrospective, longitudinal study we describe the impact of the first two years ofpalliative care program implementation on permanence in a program and hospital costs due tothe complexity level of care distribution.Healthcare costs and savings in the last trimester and last month of life, stays in the integratedpalliative care program, hospitalizations, and length of stay were analyzed. Data collected during the year before implementation was taken to represent the study baseline.Results: 108 patients were identified with palliative care needs at baseline, 139 patients during the first time frame, and 186 during the second time frame of program implementation.The average number of patients in the program/month was 35 in time frame 1, and 52 in timeframe 2 (increase by 49 %). Median permanence of deceased subjects in the program: 31 daysin time frame 1, 40 days in time frame 2 (increase by 29 %). Average number of hospitalizations(last trimester of life): 1.91 at baseline, 1.42 in the first time frame, 1.04 in the second timeframe (45 % reduction). Average length of stay in the last trimester of life: baseline 15.5 days,first time frame 10.4 days, second time frame 4.9 days (68.4 % reduction). ... (AU)

Percepção de cuidados desproporcionais entre médicos seniores, médicos residentes, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem em um centro de terapia intensiva / Perception of disproportionate care among staff physicians, training physicians, nurses, and practical nurses in an intensive care unit

Introdução: O aumento progressivo de medidas avançadas para manutenção da vida em pacientes com pouca expectativa de sobrevida gera percepção de cuidado desproporcional. Objetivamos averiguar a prevalência de cuidado desproporcional em equipe médica e enfermagem que atuam na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) em um hospital público do Brasil.Métodos: Estudo transversal envolvendo equipe médica e enfermagem em uma UTI multidisciplinar de 34 leitos de um hospital terciário no sul do Brasil de janeiro a julho de 2019. Ao total 151 profissionais responderam a um questionário eletrônico anônimo.Resultados: A taxa de resposta foi de 49,5%. Cento e dezoito (78,1%) profissionais identificaram cuidado desproporcional no ambiente de trabalho. Enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem receberam menos treinamento formal em comunicação de fim de vida do que médicos (10,6% versus 57,6%, p < 0,001). Vinte e nove (28,1%) enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem e 4 (0,08%) médicos responderam que não havia discussão sobre terminalidade na UTI (p = 0,006). Quarenta e três (89,5%) médicos afirmaram que havia colaboração entre equipe médica e equipe de enfermagem, ao passo que 58 (56,3%) enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem discordaram da assertiva (p < 0,001).Conclusão: Este é o primeiro estudo sobre percepção de cuidado desproporcional conduzido na América Latina, envolvendo residentes e técnicos de enfermagem e um centro de alta complexidade do sistema público de saúde. A vasta maioria dos profissionais percebe a existência de cuidado desproporcional em sua prática diária, independentemente da classe profissional.

Introduction: The increased use of life-sustaining measures in patients with poor long- and middle-term expected survival concerns health care providers regarding disproportionate care. The objective of this study was to report the prevalence of perceived inappropriate care among intensive care unit (ICU) staff physicians, training physicians, nurses, and practical nurses in a Brazilian public hospital.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with the medical and nursing team of a 34-bed multidisciplinary ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital in Southern Brazil from January to July 2019. A total of 151 professionals completed an anonymous electronic survey. Results: The response rate was 49.5%. One hundred and eighteen (78.1%) respondents reported disproportionate care in the work environment. Nurses and practical nurses were less likely to receive formal training on end-of-life communication compared to physicians (10.6% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001). Twenty-nine (28.1%) nurses and practical nurses vs. 4 (0.08%) physicians claimed that there were no palliative care deliberations in the ICU (p = 0.006). Of 48 senior and junior physicians, 43 (89.5%) believed that collaboration between physicians and nurses was good, whereas 58 out of 103 (56.3%) nurses and practical nurses disagreed (p < 0.001).Conclusion: This is the first survey on the perception of inappropriate care conducted in Latin America. The study included junior physicians and practical nurses working in a high-complexity medical center associated with the Brazilian public health system. Most health care providers perceived disproportionate care in their daily practice, regardless of their professional class.

Simple prognostic markers for optimal treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

ABSTRACT: Most patients with pancreatic cancer are ineligible for curative resection at diagnosis, resulting in poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.We retrospectively collected clinical data from 196 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received palliative chemotherapy (N = 153) or palliative care alone (N = 43) from January 2011 to December 2013. Patients' background data and overall survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.In patients receiving palliative chemotherapy (gemcitabine-based regimen, 88.2%) and palliative care alone, the median (range) ages were 68 (43-91) and 78 (53-90) years, and metastatic diseases were present in 80% (N = 123) and 86% (N = 37), respectively. Multivariate analysis in the palliative chemotherapy patients showed that liver metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.20, P < .001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>4.5 vs ≤4.5; HR 3.45, 95% CI 2.22-5.36, P < .001), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (≥900 vs <900 U/mL; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.05, P = .036) were independent prognostic factors. In those receiving palliative care alone, lung (HR 3.27, 95% Cl 1.46-7.35, p = 0.004) and peritoneum (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20-5.18, P = .014) metastases and the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (≥1.3 vs <1.3; HR 3.33, 95% Cl 1.51-7.35, P = .003) were independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, patients with multiple factors had worse prognosis in both groups. Median survival time of palliative chemotherapy patients with risk factors 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 13.1 (95% CI 8.0-16.9), 9.4 (95% CI 7.9-10.1), 6.6 (95% CI 4.9-7.8), and 2.5 (95% CI 1.7-4.0) months, respectively. Similarly, median survival time was 5.7 (95% CI 1.3 -8.0), 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.9), and 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-1.7) months, respectively, for palliative care alone patients with risk factor 0, 1, and 2 to 3.Prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer were neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastasis, and CA19-9 in patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lung/peritoneum metastases in patients undergoing palliative care alone. These simple markers should be considered when explaining the prognosis and therapeutic options to patients.

Early palliative intervention in septic patients reduces healthcare utilization.

INTRODUCTION: While the role of palliative care in the emergency department is recognized, barriers against the effective integration of palliative interventions and emergency care remain. We examined the association between goals-of-care and palliative care consultations and healthcare utilization outcomes in older adult patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 197 patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis or septic shock. Healthcare utilization outcomes were compared between patients divided into 3 groups: no palliative care consultation, palliative care consultation within 4 days of admission (i.e., early consultation), and palliative care consultation after 4 days of admission (i.e., late consultation). RESULTS: 51% of patients did not receive any palliative consultation, 39% of patients underwent an early palliative care consultation (within 4 days), and 10% of patients underwent a late palliative care consultation (after 4 days). Patients who received late palliative care consultation had a significantly increased number of procedures, total length of stay, ICU length of stay, and cost (p < .01, p < .001, p < .05, p < .001; respectively). Regarding early palliative care consultation, there were no statistically significant associations between this intervention and our outcomes of interest; however, we noted a trend towards decreased total length of stay and decreased healthcare cost. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis, early palliative consultations were associated with reduced healthcare utilization as compared to late palliative consultations.

Critical decisions in the trauma intensive care unit: Are we practicing primary palliative care?

BACKGROUND: Devastating injuries require both urgent assessment by a trauma service and early attention to patients' goals of care (GOC). American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) guidelines recommend an initial palliative assessment within 24 hours of admission and family meeting, if needed, within 72 hours. We hypothesize that a primary palliative care-based practice improves adherence to TQIP guidelines in trauma patients. METHODS: All adult trauma patients who died while inpatient from January 2014 to December 2018 were reviewed. Timing of GOC discussions, transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and the utilization of specialty palliative services were analyzed with univariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 415 inpatients died. Median Injury Severity Score was 26 (interquartile range [IQR], 17-34), median age was 67 years (IQR, 51-81 years), and 72% (n = 299) transitioned to CMO before death. Documented GOC discussions increased from 77% of patients in 2014 to 95% of patients in 2018 (p < 0.001), and in 2018, the median time to the first GOC discussion was 15 hours (IQR, 7- 24 hours). Specialty palliative care was consulted in 7% of all patients. Of patients who had at least one GOC discussion, 98% were led by the trauma intensive care unit (TICU) team. Median time from admission to first GOC discussion was 27 hours (IQR, 6-91 hours). Median number of GOC discussions was 1 (IQR, 1-2). Median time to CMO after the final GOC discussion was 0 hours (IQR, 0-3). Median time to death after transition to CMO was 4 hours (IQR, 1-18 hours). CONCLUSION: Of those who died during index admission, we demonstrated significant improvement in adherence to American College of Surgeons TQIP palliative guidelines across the 5-year study period, with the TICU team guiding the majority of GOC discussions. Our TICU team has developed an effective primary palliative care approach, selectively consulting specialty palliative care only when needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

A qualitative exploration of interactional and organizational determinants of collaboration in cancer palliative care settings: Family members', health care professionals' and key informants' perspectives.

As life expectancy has increased, a growing number of people experience conditions, including cancers, that carry complex health and social needs. Palliative care services have the potential to address these needs but face significant obstacles. One major obstacle is suboptimal interprofessional collaboration. This study's goal was an in-depth exploration of interactional and organizational barriers and supports of collaboration in palliative care in Switzerland. We sought the perspectives of health care professionals, patients' family members and leaders and experts in oncology/palliative care delivery (key informants) through interviews and focus groups with fifty HPs and key informants and ten patients' family members. Qualitative analyses of interviews and focus groups used framework analysis. We identified three major themes of interaction: personal characteristics, communication, and connectedness with other health care professionals; and three major organizational themes: service characteristics, standardized communication and processes, and service coordination and promotion. Based on our findings, we recommend that health care professionals consider strategies to increase their collaboration and communication skills and opportunities to interact. We advocate the implementation of methods for coordinating services, standardization of consultation/referral procedures and communication between health care professionals, and the promotion of underutilized services to foster successful, sustainable collaboration.

Changing Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care Through Medicaid Partnerships.

Since its inception in 2010, the Concurrent Care for Children Provision of the Affordable Care Act has enabled seriously ill pediatric patients and their families to access comprehensive, supportive hospice services while simultaneously receiving ongoing treatment-directed therapies. Although this groundbreaking federal legislation has resulted in improvements in care for vulnerable pediatric patients, the implementation of the law has varied from state to state through Medicaid programming. The pediatric professional community is called to consider how Medicaid services can more effectively be delivered by leveraging legislative mandates and collaborative relationships between clinicians, Medicaid administrators, and policy makers. In this article, we examine ways concurrent care has been executed in 3 different states and how key stakeholders in care for children with serious illness advocated to ensure effective implementation of the legislation. The lessons learned in working with state Medicaid programs are applicable to any advocacy issue impacting children and families .

Physicians' knowledge about palliative care in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study using digital social media platforms.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care is still a new concept in many developing countries like Bangladesh. Basic knowledge about palliative care is needed for all physicians to identify and provide this care. This study aims to assess the preliminary knowledge level and the misconceptions about this field among physicians. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 479 physicians using a self-administered structured questionnaire adapted from Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKs) on various digital social media platforms from December 2019 to February 2020. Chi-square, Fisher's extract test, and the Monte Carlo extract test was done to compare the knowledge level with the study subjects' demographic variables. RESULTS: An almost equal number of physicians of both genders from four major specialties and their allied branches took part in the study (response rate 23.9%). The majority (71%) of the respondents had an average to an excellent level of knowledge about palliative care, with a median score of 11.0. Although most physicians had average knowledge about the primary goals and general concepts of palliative care, misconceptions are highly prevalent. The commonly present misconceptions were that palliative care discourages patients from consulting other specialties (88.9%), refrains them from taking curative treatments (83.1%), and this care is only for older adults (74.5%), cancer patients (63%), and the last six months of life (56.4%). Age, educational qualifications, and specialties had significant relationships (P<0.05) with the level of knowledge. CONCLUSION: Despite having average or above knowledge about palliative care, the physicians' prevailing misconceptions act as a barrier to recognizing the need among the target populations. So, proper education and awareness among the physicians are necessary to cross this field's barrier and development.

Analysing the administration of an intermediate level of outpatient palliative care in Germany and developing recommendations for improvement (Polite): A study protocol for a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no systematic research on the intermediate level service (level 2) in outpatient palliative care that was introduced in Germany in 2017. Accordingly, the Polite research project aims at: (1) investigating the current state of level 2 palliative care and (2) developing recommendations for its optimisation. METHODS: The multi-perspective, observational study will follow a mixed-methods approach across two study phases. In phase 1a, quantitative routinely collected data from a statutory general local health insurance provider will be used to identify patients who received level 2 or other outpatient palliative care in the years 2017-2019. In phase 1b, a questionnaire will be sent to all registered general practitioners (GPs) in Lower Saxony to collect information on the number and characteristics of physicians offering level 2 palliative care. In phase 1c, a quantitative, standardised online questionnaire for teams providing specialised outpatient palliative care will be administered to assess the interfaces of level 2 palliative care. In phase 2a, the results from phases 1a-c will be discussed in an expert workshop with the aim of developing ideas to adapt and optimise level 2 outpatient palliative care. Finally, in phase 2b, the empirically derived recommendations from phases 1 and 2a will be agreed upon via a multi-round Delphi survey involving experts with sufficient influence to promote the project results and recommendations nationally. DISCUSSION: The results of the project will facilitate the optimisation of outpatient palliative care, as well as its administration, nationwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien) (Registration N° DRKS00024785); date of registration: 06th May 2021) and is searchable under the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal of the World Health Organization, under the German Clinical Trials Register number.

Delivering Community Emergency Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Physician Response Unit.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant challenges to services providing emergency care, in both the community and hospital setting. The Physician Response Unit (PRU) is a Community Emergency Medicine model, working closely with community, hospital and pre-hospital services. In response to the pandemic, the PRU has been able to rapidly introduce novel pathways designed to support local emergency departments (EDs) and local emergency patients. The pathways are (1) supporting discharge from acute medical and older people's services wards into the community; (2) supporting acute oncology services; (3) supporting EDs; (4) supporting palliative care services. Establishing these pathways have facilitated a number of vulnerable patients to access patient-focussed and holistic definitive emergency care. The pathways have also allowed EDs to safely discharge patients to the community, and also mitigate some of the problems associated with trying to maintain isolation for vulnerable patients within the ED. Community Emergency Medicine models are able to reduce ED attendances and hospital admissions, and hence risk of crowding, as well as reducing nosocomial risks for patients who can have high-quality emergency care brought to them. This model may also provide various alternative solutions in the delivery of safe emergency care in the postpandemic healthcare landscape.

Pediatric Palliative Care Programs in US Hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is integral to the care of children living with serious illnesses. Despite the growth in the number of established palliative care programs over the past decade, little is known about the current operational features of PPC programs across the country. METHODS: The National Palliative Care Registry collects annualized data on palliative care programs' structures, processes, and staffing. Using data from the 2018 registry survey, we report on the operational features of inpatient PPC programs across the United States. RESULTS: Fifty-four inpatient PPC programs submitted data about their operations. Programs reported a median of 3.8 full-time equivalent staff per 10 000 hospital admissions (range 0.7-12.1) across the core interdisciplinary team, yet few (37%) met the minimum standards of practice for staffing. Programs provided more annual consults if they were longer-standing, had more interdisciplinary full-time equivalent staff, offered 24/7 availability for patients and families, or were at larger hospitals. The majority of programs reported concern for burnout (63%) and an inability to meet clinical demand with available staffing (60%). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in PPC program operations and structure in hospitals. This study affirms the need for updated program standards and guidelines, as well as research that describes how different care delivery models impact outcomes for patients, families, staff, and health care systems. Future studies that further define the clinical demand, workload, and sustainability challenges of PPC programs are necessary to foster the provision of high-quality PPC and maintain a vital clinical workforce.